Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 21 Dec 2006 12:48:35 +0100
From:      Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
To:        Andrew Pantyukhin <infofarmer@freebsd.org>
Cc:        gnome@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Change text of buttons in Liferea 1.2.0.
Message-ID:  <1166701715.17288.0.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
In-Reply-To: <cb5206420612210321k3389c5cdob834d3a697756b8d@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <op.tkvhafvv9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <op.tkvjqns29aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <cb5206420612210321k3389c5cdob834d3a697756b8d@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrew Pantyukhin p=ED=B9e v =E8t 21. 12. 2006 v 14:21 +0300:
> On 12/20/06, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> wrote:
> > On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:19:17 -0600, Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net> wr=
ote:
> >
> > > Hello folks,
> > >
> > > I dislike how they have changed text of buttons in Liferea 1.2.0, so =
I
> > > have created a patch to bring old text of buttons back. It's shorter,
> > > make buttons smaller and look better. Just add below under the
> > > post-patch of Makefile for anyone that want it too.
> > >
> > >       ${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's|_New Subscription...|_New Feed|g ; \
> > >               s|_Next Unread Item|_Next Unread|g ; \
> > >               s|_Mark Selected As Read|_Mark As Read|g ; \
> > >               s|Search All Feeds...|Search|g' \
> > >                       ${WRKSRC}/src/ui/ui_mainwindow.c
> >
> > Just add a warning, do not annoy to the maintainer to add this hack. It
> > will never happen. If I maintain for Liferea and I will never commit th=
is
> > hack in ports tree either. Keep this hack in your own ports tree and
> > maintain it by yourself just like I have many hacks and unofficial
> > ports in my own tree.
>=20
> Is it a major glitch in my gmail account or are you
> talking to yourself?

Yes, he's talking to himself :)

> Anyways, whichever side you're on, it might be OK to
> make this an optional hack. It's not site-specific
> or something, sounds like it improves usability - so
> why not expose it to users.

I don't want to expose users to more OPTIONS entries than strictly
necessary. So no.

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

In the computer industry, there are three kinds of lies:
lies, damn lies, and benchmarks.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1166701715.17288.0.camel>