From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 10:54:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFF716A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:54:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net (defout.telus.net [199.185.220.240]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A71743D2F for ; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:54:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@icionline.ca) Received: from [192.168.19.4] (really [142.179.173.206]) by priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.netESMTP <20040114185448.TARR8295.priv-edtnes56.telusplanet.net@[192.168.19.4]>; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:54:48 -0700 From: James Earl To: Peter Ulrich Kruppa In-Reply-To: <20040114192421.W2366@pukruppa.net> References: <1073782842.70574.17.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20040114061851.X2366@pukruppa.net> <1074097078.59003.3.camel@work> <1074102043.774.12.camel@gyros> <1074102831.59003.9.camel@work> <20040114192421.W2366@pukruppa.net> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1074106556.59003.37.camel@work> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:55:56 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP TESTERS: New GNOME upgrade script available X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:54:50 -0000 On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 11:43, Peter Ulrich Kruppa wrote: > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, James Earl wrote: > > > On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 10:40, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > > > On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 11:17, James Earl wrote: > > > > The GNOME Development Branch FAQ seems to give a little insight into > > > > some of the problems people may encounter with the Development version. > > > > > > If you have more suggestions, please let us know. > > > > > > Joe > > > > I wish I would've read the Dev. FAQ before trying out 2.5.2... I like to > > see the pretty icons! ;) > Please mind: Joe asked to test gome_upgrade.sh and send comments. > I did test it and mailed what happened. > If people were happy spending their time reading docs, faqs and > mans there wouldn't be any need to work on a GUI with clicky-icons. > We could stay with the console and type latex documents. Hi Peter, I agree, that's a good point. I guess that's probably why I didn't read it. In case it came across this way... I didn't mean to suggest you needed to read the FAQ. James