From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 13 16:17:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8C337B401 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 16:17:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-150.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 579C543FBF for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 16:17:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from rot13.obsecurity.org (rot13.obsecurity.org [10.0.0.5]) by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AE5C66CFA; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 16:17:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by rot13.obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E94561163; Sun, 13 Apr 2003 16:17:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 16:17:15 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Mike Meyer Message-ID: <20030413231715.GA53083@rot13.obsecurity.org> References: <20030412214156.GA72155@gicco.homeip.net> <20030412225822.GA89415@rot13.obsecurity.org> <20030413075730.GA56425@gicco.homeip.net> <16025.29187.398575.236430@guru.mired.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16025.29187.398575.236430@guru.mired.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: imake 1.0 vs. 4.3.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 23:17:17 -0000 --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 09:19:47AM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote: > In <20030413075730.GA56425@gicco.homeip.net>, Hanspeter Roth typed: > > On Apr 12 at 15:58, Kris Kennaway spoke: > > > imake is for XFree86 3.x. You have to remove it before you can > > > install 4.x > > Are conflicting ports not handled by the ports system? >=20 > They aren't detected by the ports system, and it will let you install > ports that overwrite parts of other ports or the system. I will soon be committing patches that allow packages to register conflicts. > > How can one know whether there are conflicts with other ports? >=20 > Usually because the names are similar. >=20 > I'm not sure where Kris got the idea that imake couldn't coexist with > XFree86 4. I've got imake 4.3.0 installed as well as XFree86 4.3, and > haven't had any problems. For that matter, I have a slew of ports that > are tagged as depending on imake, though why they should depend on it > after the build I don't know. When I said imake I meant the imake port (imake-1.0) as opposed to the imake-4 port (imake-4.3.0). Kris --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+me/7Wry0BWjoQKURAu0/AKCrrUKZoX0JaUBFAKyZJclYrKLu2gCgzNHH rZV/P+Qf5C+rDglXiNuX400= =Q+bB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--