From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Sep 28 18:46:45 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C2D916A41F
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:46:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB3243D49
	for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:46:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id A129F2B22; Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:46:44 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 13:46:44 -0500
To: Mark Kane <mark@mkproductions.org>
Message-ID: <20050928184644.GA18993@soaustin.net>
References: <433855C1.4060803@mkproductions.org>
	<433AC90D.80608@mkproductions.org>
	<20050928172829.GB5451@soaustin.net>
	<433ADE61.7030208@mkproductions.org>
	<20050928183013.GA18483@soaustin.net>
	<433AE2FE.30201@mkproductions.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <433AE2FE.30201@mkproductions.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
From: linimon@lonesome.com (Mark Linimon)
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade Error
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:46:45 -0000

On Wed, Sep 28, 2005 at 01:37:50PM -0500, Mark Kane wrote:
> The last portupgrade went fine, but is that something I should worry about?

There are a lot of dependencies in the ports framework so I'm afraid I
can't offer any absolute guarantees.

> Do you think I NEED to run it based on that output? The guide to 
> portupgrade I am following says to definitely run it if I am told to, 
> but doesn't say anything about running it otherwise.

In theory, running it if the databases is already correct should have no effect.

mcl