From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Sep 19 18:26:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA04354 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 18:26:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from austin.polstra.com (austin.polstra.com [206.213.73.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA04343 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 18:26:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@austin.polstra.com) Received: from austin.polstra.com (jdp@localhost) by austin.polstra.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA00387; Sat, 19 Sep 1998 18:26:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Message-Id: <199809200126.SAA00387@austin.polstra.com> To: alc@cs.rice.edu Subject: Re: GDB modifies shared libraries? In-Reply-To: <19980918212357.L656@cs.rice.edu> References: <19980918212357.L656@cs.rice.edu> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sat, 19 Sep 1998 18:26:02 -0700 From: John Polstra Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <19980918212357.L656@cs.rice.edu>, Alan Cox wrote: > Take a look at revision 1.24 of procfs_mem.c and some related > changes in vm_map.c. None of these fixes were ever applied > to -stable. Yes, I found the changes you're talking about. I was able to merge them into -stable without much trouble. I'm running them now, and they seem to fix the problem. I'll test some more and commit the fix to the -stable branch if I don't find any problems with it. John -- John Polstra jdp@polstra.com John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Self-knowledge is always bad news." -- John Barth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message