From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 17 15:20:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B88A106566C for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us) Received: from blade.simplesystems.org (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C11C8FC12 for ; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:20:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freddy.simplesystems.org (freddy.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.65]) by blade.simplesystems.org (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3HFK4DC001933; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:20:04 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:20:04 -0500 (CDT) From: Bob Friesenhahn X-X-Sender: bfriesen@freddy.simplesystems.org To: Rick Macklem In-Reply-To: <331249373.149024.1303001146870.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Message-ID: References: <331249373.149024.1303001146870.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> User-Agent: Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.2 (blade.simplesystems.org [65.66.246.90]); Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:20:04 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: make the experimental NFS subsystem the default one X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 15:20:06 -0000 On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, Rick Macklem wrote: > >> Client throughput of >> FreeBSD's default NFS is low. I would be hoping to get more >> throughput. Also, modern NFS uses TCP so I would expect to use that. > > Hmm. At least for read rate on a large file, others see wire speed at 1Gbps > and I think some get close to wire speed on 10Gbps. (I see wire speed for 100Mbps, > but that doesn't say much:-) > > Was it read rate you were referring to or something else? Yes, read rate. Large file read performance was much better between two Solaris systems compared with Solaris as the server and FreeBSD as the client. This is when using gigabit ethernet. Bob -- Bob Friesenhahn bfriesen@simple.dallas.tx.us, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/ GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/