From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jan 14 10:11:54 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB2A416A41F
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:11:54 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bp@vertex.kz)
Received: from relay.vertex.kz (relay.vertex.kz [212.19.129.142])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0668743D45
	for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:11:53 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bp@vertex.kz)
Received: from lion.butya.kz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by relay.vertex.kz (Postfix) with SMTP id 5DA035CA0;
	Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:11:51 +0600 (ALMT)
Received: from relay.vertex.kz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by localhost.vertex.kz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34F655B48;
	Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:11:51 +0600 (ALMT)
Received: by relay.vertex.kz (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 2C6DC5B47; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:11:51 +0600 (ALMT)
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:11:51 +0600
From: Boris Popov <bp@freebsd.org>
To: Victor Snezhko <snezhko@indorsoft.ru>
Message-ID: <20060114101151.GT99226@vertex.kz>
References: <ufynxqw32.fsf@indorsoft.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ufynxqw32.fsf@indorsoft.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i
Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: mount_smbfs, windows 2003 domain shares and NETSMBCRYPTO
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:11:54 -0000

On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:06:57PM +0600, Victor Snezhko wrote:
> 
> I went to dig into sources and found that option NETSMBCRYPTO is a
> solution. On my -current box it is the only option that needs to be
> added to make things work.
> 
> Hope this message will be more helpful than bullshit about turning
> off signing on DC (it works, but it's just not right). 
> 
> Couple of questions:
> 
> 1) Would it be right to include this hint to a mount_smbfs manpage?
>    I could prepare a patch and send it to the doc@ maillist.

	I think so.
> 
> 2) Is there a reason for this option not being in GENERIC? It's
>    absence makes mount_smbfs in conjunction with default kernel more
>    and more useless (as time passes and more domain controllers jump
>    to windows 2003).

	There can be some restrictions with supplying cryptography
in the GENERIC config, but I'm not the right person to answer such
questions.

-- 
Boris Popov