Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:11:51 +0600 From: Boris Popov <bp@freebsd.org> To: Victor Snezhko <snezhko@indorsoft.ru> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mount_smbfs, windows 2003 domain shares and NETSMBCRYPTO Message-ID: <20060114101151.GT99226@vertex.kz> In-Reply-To: <ufynxqw32.fsf@indorsoft.ru> References: <ufynxqw32.fsf@indorsoft.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:06:57PM +0600, Victor Snezhko wrote: > > I went to dig into sources and found that option NETSMBCRYPTO is a > solution. On my -current box it is the only option that needs to be > added to make things work. > > Hope this message will be more helpful than bullshit about turning > off signing on DC (it works, but it's just not right). > > Couple of questions: > > 1) Would it be right to include this hint to a mount_smbfs manpage? > I could prepare a patch and send it to the doc@ maillist. I think so. > > 2) Is there a reason for this option not being in GENERIC? It's > absence makes mount_smbfs in conjunction with default kernel more > and more useless (as time passes and more domain controllers jump > to windows 2003). There can be some restrictions with supplying cryptography in the GENERIC config, but I'm not the right person to answer such questions. -- Boris Popov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060114101151.GT99226>