From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 10 20:01:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E691065672 for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gonzo@hq.bluezbox.com) Received: from hq.bluezbox.com (hq.bluezbox.com [70.38.37.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB458FC0C for ; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:01:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=[IPv6:::1]) by hq.bluezbox.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.73 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Szuy5-0000n3-Ox for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:33:59 -0700 Message-ID: <50256231.3030008@bluezbox.com> Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 12:34:09 -0700 From: Oleksandr Tymoshenko User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: gonzo@hq.bluezbox.com X-Spam-Level: ---- X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "hq.bluezbox.com", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see The administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Any objections to merging projects/armv6 back to HEAD? There is one cache issue I'm aware of that still has to be fixed, but it doesn't affect arm architectures earlier than armv6. And we can work on it in trunk. [...] Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.8 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP -2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Subject: projects/armv6 merge X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2012 20:01:59 -0000 Any objections to merging projects/armv6 back to HEAD? There is one cache issue I'm aware of that still has to be fixed, but it doesn't affect arm architectures earlier than armv6. And we can work on it in trunk. If there are no objections - the plan is to split code drop into several patches and perform merge over weekend. -- gonzo