From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu May  1 17:02:56 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44585984
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 May 2014 17:02:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D416D13BD
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 May 2014 17:02:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wi0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hi5so1066876wib.0
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Thu, 01 May 2014 10:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=Bg16RAnq+BE/Gk90rtR1Uo4PoB+NRPR+z8F8VCb9SZA=;
 b=rs8qkAWdUZ9Ak6ogbPJQPP80PXJzJStPWNHyu6oJO9ewi317uU2Mja5xVdL2JSRBud
 oT0c3kqSqY/XmHHhQTibeFgZYexN8coS0HzKSuzNDN8bxiYinFvL7Cb/ETUNjIDXBCPq
 IpPWjCBI21/D8b+KPeQo3QwzcyDMZlk1HtT4N1Vi98VrUnJ1wfK/SbDKgybwpWlN5Mkf
 05EZj9Ua7dHcE71aov6YBFvcUY16OkgLYXi7uzvDQGlfu7UxSbvMoE8uXz0pzuN0Cty5
 HHetH3Y4ho59t+1reJ5+IgZslRk70g1K8KG4p9JhPT/UghjywIJIPba0IxRVJABLVgg+
 RqiA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.82.35 with SMTP id f3mr9958779wjy.36.1398963774178; Thu,
 01 May 2014 10:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.217.10.195 with HTTP; Thu, 1 May 2014 10:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAcX-AFVwzGXxpYXzjq5j3Up0mj8nwg6H_rsdELjvjevfvoTyw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAAcX-AFVwzGXxpYXzjq5j3Up0mj8nwg6H_rsdELjvjevfvoTyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 13:02:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CADH-AwEvjRx+3XZZuGYeLWsGdsDQOTGxXzSpmrBHjufDrNC4yA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Beaglebone black network performance
From: Winston Smith <smith.winston.101@gmail.com>
To: =?UTF-8?B?w5Z6a2FuIEtJUklL?= <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2014 17:02:56 -0000

On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:47 PM, =C3=96zkan KIRIK <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com> w=
rote:
> Rasberry PI's network performance is about 6-7Mbit/s, and ping latencies
> are about 10-20 milliseconds. I think it's too high. I used iperf for
> bandwidth testing.

The RPi's 10/100 ethernet controller is connected to the BCM2835 SoC
via it's USB controller, so the USB controller has to share it's
bandwidth between the peripherals.

The BBB also has a 10/100 ethernet, but it's directly supported by the
SoC, so the performance *should* be a little better, particularly when
there's other USB traffic.