Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 08:13:47 -0700 From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com> To: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" <questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Automounter (amd) troubles Message-ID: <CAOgwaMtuukd78N7CHF-ErG34fpnz30k-JkYTdb7bq8h%2Bq4Sutw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <552A8950.8040505@netfence.it> References: <55290836.9030306@netfence.it> <CAOgwaMt918AyZPmqa9H_9RxDyBHkcyPBnd2X%2BHxEhE6SJDdYkQ@mail.gmail.com> <552A8950.8040505@netfence.it>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Apr 12, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote: > On 04/11/15 14:24, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote: > > https://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=mount_nfs&; >> sektion=8&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+10.1-RELEASE >> >> >> See "intr" option . It can be specified in client fstab mount line , to >> skip unresponsive NFS server(s) . >> > > Thanks, but in the end I got sick of NFS: Zyxel's implementation is > painfully slow (400kB/s!!!), so I tried FFP/unfsd, but that hangs. > > I managed to compile bacula on this NAS and my backups are working > properly: 22 minutes instead of the 12 hours that Zyxel's NFS required. > > > Your suggestion, however, will be helpful in another case I have :) > > bye > av. > It is very likely that in Zyxel's NFS server definition , there is a "sync" option . If it is like that , converting it to "async" may work sufficiently fast . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOgwaMtuukd78N7CHF-ErG34fpnz30k-JkYTdb7bq8h%2Bq4Sutw>