From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 3 20:16:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E576E16A41C for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 20:16:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saturnero@freesbie.org) Received: from jail1-fbsd4.consiagnet.it (jail1-fbsd4.consiagnet.it [83.149.128.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E63443D49 for ; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 20:16:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from saturnero@freesbie.org) Received: by jail1-fbsd4.consiagnet.it (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 56A9D5839; Sun, 3 Jul 2005 22:16:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 3 Jul 2005 22:16:21 +0200 From: Dario Freni To: Scott Long Message-ID: <20050703201621.GD89744@cvs.freesbie.org> References: <20050703181616.GC89744@cvs.freesbie.org> <42C83643.4010506@samsco.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <42C83643.4010506@samsco.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE (What else? ;) X-Sent-From: cvs.freesbie.org X-GPG-Key: http://www.saturnero.net/saturnero.asc X-GPG-Fingerprint: 9C23 3CED 32A4 1E6E 7F83 042F CA68 BBD8 8892 872B User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [saturnero@freesbie.org: Weird behaviour of mount_unionfs with executables] X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 20:16:09 -0000 --q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 01:02:27PM -0600, Scott Long wrote: > >I'm also afraid that copying files to the upper layer also when > >they're not modified could fill up our mfs entirely. I'm almost sure > >there's a totally different behaviour under RELENG_5, as we haven't > >encountered such problems. > > > > >=20 > You might very well have found a bug in the vnode pager. I take it that > this doesn't happen on 5-STABLE, correct? Correct. I'm sure that from 5.4-RELEASE to -STABLE unionfs work as expected for me. The very strange thing is that a recalled file is copied (with fixed permissions) to the upper layer even if it wasn't modified. In my case, the upper layer is a mdmfs, so it will be surely filled up to its entire size after running executables for a total amount of 32Mb. Quite boring. Bye, Dario --=20 Dario Freni (saturnero@freesbie.org) FreeSBIE developer (http://www.freesbie.org) GPG Public key at http://www.saturnero.net/saturnero.asc --q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCyEeUymi72IiShysRAnxXAKD7HEAWAgPZc+oe/Y2+ix//QDjqaQCfUHJi ImdhmabGMI+LNiam4n5lqME= =waz7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --q9KOos5vDmpwPx9o--