From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Apr 4 14:28:13 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.thenap.com (mailman.thenap.com [209.190.0.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6943237B724 for ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:28:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from drew.weaver@thenap.com) Received: by mailman.thenap.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Wed, 4 Apr 2001 17:41:56 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Drew J. Weaver" To: "Drew J. Weaver" , 'Robert Hough' , FreeBSD-ISP@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Chasing the kiddies (was: Named Keep crashing) Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2001 17:41:54 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C0BD50.11908F36" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0BD50.11908F36 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Typo Btw that was supposed to say "none of my servers are multi-port scanable as they only run services on port 80" and all other ports are hardware and software firewalled. and are very secured =) -Drew -----Original Message----- From: Drew J. Weaver Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 5:38 PM To: 'Robert Hough'; FreeBSD-ISP@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Chasing the kiddies (was: Named Keep crashing) This will be my last reply in this thread, and I just wanted to say. I was speaking theoretically, are multi-port scanable at this time and are very secure. Have a groovy day. -----Original Message----- From: Robert Hough [ mailto:rch@solveinteractive.com ] Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 5:21 PM To: FreeBSD-ISP@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Chasing the kiddies (was: Named Keep crashing) On Wed, Apr 04, 2001, Drew J. Weaver wrote: > Because if I wanted you using a service on one of my boxes you'd know about > it already, and wouldn't need to port scan my servers. Security through Obscurity eh? Sounds like a dangerous practice to me, but whatever works for you I suppose... -- Robert Hough (rch@solveinteractive.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message ------_=_NextPart_001_01C0BD50.11908F36 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" RE: Chasing the kiddies (was: Named Keep crashing)
Typo Btw that was supposed to say "none of my servers are multi-port scanable as they only run services on port 80" and all other ports are hardware and software firewalled. and are very secured =)
 
-Drew
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Drew J. Weaver
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 5:38 PM
To: 'Robert Hough'; FreeBSD-ISP@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: RE: Chasing the kiddies (was: Named Keep crashing)

This will be my last reply in this thread, and I just wanted to say. I was speaking theoretically, are multi-port scanable at this time and are very secure.

Have a groovy day.

-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Hough [mailto:rch@solveinteractive.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2001 5:21 PM
To: FreeBSD-ISP@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Chasing the kiddies (was: Named Keep crashing)


On Wed, Apr 04, 2001, Drew J. Weaver wrote:

> Because if I wanted you using a service on one of my boxes you'd know about
> it already, and wouldn't need to port scan my servers.

Security through Obscurity eh? Sounds like a dangerous practice to me, but
whatever works for you I suppose...

--
Robert Hough (rch@solveinteractive.com)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message

------_=_NextPart_001_01C0BD50.11908F36-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message