From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Fri Mar 29 08:46:50 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56C1155F218 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:46:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dr.klepp@gmx.at) Received: from vie01a-dmta-at50-2.mx.upcmail.net (vie01a-dmta-at50-2.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA873858A2 for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dr.klepp@gmx.at) Received: from [172.31.216.41] (helo=vie01a-pemc-psmtp-at50) by vie01a-dmta-at50.mx.upcmail.net with esmtp (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1h9n4X-00066K-Sr for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:41:09 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([85.126.97.210]) by vie01a-pemc-psmtp-at50 with SMTP @ mailcloud.upcmail.net id tkh91z01q4YLlkt0Bkh9ER; Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:41:09 +0100 X-SourceIP: 85.126.97.210 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=O6RJhF1W c=1 sm=2 tr=0 a=/Ac8Q0O/YFE5LOLfUiYZVw==:117 a=/Ac8Q0O/YFE5LOLfUiYZVw==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=eHL4P6T5Issbh7DMBnkA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 From: "Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why is Sendmail still around? Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 09:41:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4101a1092141b58e05ef7552278b15ff@kathe.in> In-Reply-To: X-KMail-QuotePrefix: > MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201903290941.19684.dr.klepp@gmx.at> X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: EA873858A2 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++++++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; spf=fail (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of dr.klepp@gmx.at does not designate 62.179.121.137 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=dr.klepp@gmx.at X-Spamd-Result: default: False [10.41 / 15.00]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmx.at]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mx00.emig.gmx.net]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmx.at]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6830, ipnet:62.179.0.0/17, country:AT]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[137.121.179.62.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.88)[0.883,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[gmx.at]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.98)[0.976,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(1.00)[1.000,0]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; FROM_NAME_HAS_TITLE(1.00)[dr]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; FORGED_MUA_KMAIL_MSGID(3.00)[]; GREYLIST(0.00)[pass,body]; IP_SCORE(0.76)[asn: 6830(3.90), country: AT(-0.10)] X-Spam: Yes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 08:46:50 -0000 Anno domini 2019 Fri, 29 Mar 09:22:32 +0100 Andrea Venturoli scripsit: > On 3/29/19 2:59 AM, Mayuresh Kathe wrote: > > easier to configure for simple tasks than Sendmail. > > Just out of curiosity, what do you find so hard in configuring sendmail > *for simple tasks*? > (I agree it's somewhat confusing sometimes when it comes to complex > edge-cases). Last time I looked at sendmail, it did not deliver local mail when no notwork and/or nameserver was available. Testing was done on a fresh installation of FreeBSD 10, so maybe things have changed. Nik > > bye > av. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA, CIA ...