From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Feb 6 3:50:21 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp04.wxs.nl (smtp04.wxs.nl [195.121.6.59]) by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA8E3D0C for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 03:50:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from daemon.ninth-circle.org ([195.121.196.154]) by smtp04.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.61) with ESMTP id AAA1552; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 12:50:04 +0100 Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by daemon.ninth-circle.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA27722; Sun, 6 Feb 2000 12:50:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2000 12:49:59 +0100 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: lists@security.za.net Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW / IP Filter question Message-ID: <20000206124959.E319@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from lists@security.za.net on Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 11:28:49PM +0200 Organisation: Ninth-Circle Enterprises Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20000203 22:43], lists@security.za.net (lists@security.za.net) wrote: >I would have thought you would use the tee option in ipfw for this, but >its not implemented yet according to my man pages, so I was wondering if >there was another way to do this, cause it makes traffic analysis a hell >of a lot easier if I can do this rather than having to sniff it with bpf >or something. Didn't CURRENT add the tee option by now? I really recall a commit message stating tee support has been added... -- Jeroen Ruigrok vd Werven/Asmodai asmodai@[wxs.nl|bart.nl|freebsd.org] Documentation nutter/B-rated Coder BSD: Technical excellence at its best The BSD Programmer's Documentation Project The Eyes of Truth are always watching you... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message