From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Nov 19 10:05:53 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA05965 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:05:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from coconut.itojun.org (coconut.itojun.org [210.160.95.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id KAA05959; Wed, 19 Nov 1997 10:05:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from itojun@itojun.org) Received: from localhost (itojun@localhost.itojun.org [127.0.0.1]) by coconut.itojun.org (8.8.5/3.6Wbeta6) with ESMTP id DAA19881; Thu, 20 Nov 1997 03:00:47 +0900 (JST) To: Ruslan Ermilov cc: itojun@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org In-reply-to: ru's message of Mon, 17 Nov 1997 14:22:38 +0200. <199711171222.OAA14473@relay.ucb.crimea.ua> X-Template-Reply-To: itojun@itojun.org X-Template-Return-Receipt-To: itojun@itojun.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: F8 24 B4 2C 8C 98 57 FD 90 5F B4 60 79 54 16 E2 Subject: Re: IPSec and 2.2-STABLE From: Jun-ichiro itojun Itoh Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 03:00:46 +0900 Message-ID: <19877.879962446@coconut.itojun.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >What is the general state of IPSec for FreeBSD? We, WIDE project IPv6 working group is working on IPv6/IPsec extension for FreeBSD. As for IPsec we support both rfc182* and draft-ietf-*. ESP Transport mode is working very well. ESP Tunnel mode is yet to be done. See http://www.v6.wide.ad.jp/ for more info. >Can I use it with post-2.2.5-RELEASE (i.e. 2.2-STABLE)? We use 2.2.5-RELEASE as base version but I believe our patch can easily be applied. itojun