From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 25 17:26:40 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBC316A402 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3912213C465 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:26:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m1PHQOKU004019; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:26:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m1PHQHKs004016; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:26:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 18:26:17 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Nenad Mihajlovic In-Reply-To: <20080225163839.0ynsnyqygwgs84cg@venturis.hu> Message-ID: <20080225182407.K3973@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080225163839.0ynsnyqygwgs84cg@venturis.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD SAMBA file server performance - strange behaviour X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 17:26:40 -0000 > address from the fileserver, i get performance increase in the transfer speed > - the bigger the traffic i generate, the better the results, which max out at > 25-27 MB/sec with flood ping. > > Has anyone else experienced any similar behaviour? > yes. there was (but at 100Mbit/s) autonegotiation problems, switch got "half duplex" while computer worked full duplex - which lead to packet losses. setting manually to 100Mbit/s half-duplex (on server) fixed this. but check, it may not be your case