From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 23 14:42:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3B2106566C for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.17.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674C58FC1E for ; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from janh.freebsd (e177241117.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.177.241.117]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu8) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0ML31I-1LQNFC0zZt-0001pZ; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:42:50 +0100 Message-ID: <4979D769.6000908@janh.de> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:42:49 +0100 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090115) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/qjywOnjVzZDyK63JZV6cSMMgsJ4DdWNZyaJh 5CnHNqYA69qNzTic356YIf96BzccEk1XtUAsJE0MJUTArlfhyY 2fKxfRhJJhOwfNZD9wDJw== Subject: libtasn1 shlib bump fallout X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:42:52 -0000 I know that some people do not agree with the PORTREVISION bumping at all. Anyhow, after the libtasn1 shlib bump there were some ports bumped, but many got missed that have files linking against libtasn1.so.3 according to 'libchk -v'. I found these: cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_2 ekiga-2.0.11_5 ghostscript8-8.63 gnome-control-center-2.24.0.1 gnome-panel-2.24.3 gtk-2.14.7 gvfs-1.0.3 kdelibs-3.5.10 libpurple-2.5.4 pidgin-2.5.4 wireshark-1.0.5 I build these ports with standard options, but not in a tinderbox. Thus, I am not really sure if default packages from a tinderbox are affected. At least some of the ports mentioned above do not have a dependency listed, but depend indirectly on libtasn1 installed. Anyhow, bumping recursively seems to be a little too much, since most indirect dependencies do not link directly -- on my system, according to 'libchk -v' there are many big packages (kde, openoffice.org, thunderbird, firefox, ...) unaffected. Thus, there should probably be only a note about it in UPDATING. I am still not sure, if relying on the 'libchk -v' output is any good for removing stuff from lib/compat/pkg, but I do not know a better way to ensure packages build not depending on old libs. Cheers, Jan Henrik