Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Apr 2022 15:32:57 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        net@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 263202] "route already in table" - even though it's not, and can't be deleted
Message-ID:  <bug-263202-7501-H8G3tuBRjc@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-263202-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References:  <bug-263202-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D263202

--- Comment #12 from Pat Maddox <pat@patmaddox.com> ---
(In reply to Zhenlei Huang from comment #9)

Actually it looks like you do in fact have that lo0 route in the table alre=
ady
(the second line). So I would expect your first add command to fail. What=
=E2=80=99s
strange is that you can=E2=80=99t delete it, even though netstat shows it.

My problem is a bit different - I can=E2=80=99t add that route at all.

Then at that point we have a similar problem, where we can=E2=80=99t delete=
 the route
because it supposedly doesn=E2=80=99t exist. Although in your case, it sure=
 looks like
it exists!

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-263202-7501-H8G3tuBRjc>