Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 22 May 2019 13:36:50 +0100
From:      Grzegorz Junka <list1@gjunka.com>
To:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: pkg upgrade -f dying on me
Message-ID:  <e1404ede-01d8-20c2-2a12-b01cfa9670fa@gjunka.com>
In-Reply-To: <7a1517e4ddfe7a35f099089817ad06a6@ijs.si>
References:  <5f5106d4-6664-1a02-013e-bfb83afa55a3@gjunka.com> <20190522110316.GG72200@home.opsec.eu> <64b3c8d3-85c6-4db8-2ec7-52803cc82296@gjunka.com> <7a1517e4ddfe7a35f099089817ad06a6@ijs.si>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 22/05/2019 13:30, Mark Martinec wrote:
> 2019-05-22 13:46, je Grzegorz Junka wrote:
>> root@someserv:~ # pkg --version
>> 1.10.5
>> root@someserv:~ # /usr/local/sbin/pkg-static upgrade -f
>> Updating desktop_nvidia repository catalogue...
>> desktop_nvidia repository is up to date.
>> All repositories are up to date.
>> Checking for upgrades (1637 candidates):  46%
>> libwps03 has no direct installation candidates, change it to libwps? 
>> [Y/n]:
>> Checking for upgrades (1637 candidates):  81%
>> gmime26 has no direct installation candidates, change it to gmime30? 
>> [Y/n]:
>> Checking for upgrades (1637 candidates):  82%
>> glib12 has no direct installation candidates, change it to glib? [Y/n]:
>> Checking for upgrades (1637 candidates): 100%
>> Processing candidates (1637 candidates): 100%
>> Child process pid=4192 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault
>
> This has been my experience (mostly) ever since pkg-ng was introduced.
> When answering Y to such questions, it is very likely it will crash.
>
> My 'solution' is not to accept any of the offered changes, but
> just to delete the defunct packages, do the pkg upgrade, then
> install whatever is still needed.
>

Great, thank you Mark. That worked!

GrzegorzJ




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e1404ede-01d8-20c2-2a12-b01cfa9670fa>