From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 28 19:58:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B5716A4CE; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:58:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7942F43D49; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:58:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Received: from [194.192.25.143] (laptop.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.143]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id iBSJwncJ074991; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:58:51 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Message-ID: <41D1BAD3.5020804@DeepCore.dk> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:58:11 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.2 (X11/20040802) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ruslan Ermilov References: <20041224094127.GA75931@ip.net.ua> <41CC425C.7050906@DeepCore.dk> <20041224220821.GB86330@ip.net.ua> <41CC9BDA.7020203@DeepCore.dk> <20041224233021.GA43419@ip.net.ua> <41CFEFAF.8040100@DeepCore.dk> <20041227141310.GA95767@ip.net.ua> <41D03AA4.3020908@DeepCore.dk> <20041228110644.GB14010@ip.net.ua> <41D15650.7080504@DeepCore.dk> <20041228152641.GC14010@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20041228152641.GC14010@ip.net.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.4 cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Soren Schmidt Subject: Re: ATA regression [PATCH] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 19:58:55 -0000 Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 01:49:20PM +0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote: >=20 >>Ruslan Ermilov wrote: >> >> >>>So I analyzed what was changed in this ata-chipset.c revision >>>when it comes to my chip, and tried the following patch, and >>>it brought me back my ad8 drive: >> >>Hmm, there are grimlins in there alright. Could you try the attached=20 >>patch as thats what I have in my WIP and it cleans up the code a bit as= =20 >>well.. >> >=20 > Tried that -- got the same identification failure followed by > the double free panic. But it cannot obviously help -- this > patch is for ata_promise_chipinit(), and it by itself might be > needed for something else, but my patch was for > ata_promise_mio_reset() which doesn't seem to handle PRCMBO > controllers at all in its current version. Oh crap! I just got the first half of the patch in the diff, sorry 'bout = that. I'll get the rest along when I get back to the lab tomorrow... --=20 -S=F8ren