Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:58:11 +0100
From:      =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@DeepCore.dk>
To:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Soren Schmidt <sos@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: ATA regression [PATCH]
Message-ID:  <41D1BAD3.5020804@DeepCore.dk>
In-Reply-To: <20041228152641.GC14010@ip.net.ua>
References:  <20041224094127.GA75931@ip.net.ua> <41CC425C.7050906@DeepCore.dk> <20041224220821.GB86330@ip.net.ua> <41CC9BDA.7020203@DeepCore.dk> <20041224233021.GA43419@ip.net.ua> <41CFEFAF.8040100@DeepCore.dk> <20041227141310.GA95767@ip.net.ua> <41D03AA4.3020908@DeepCore.dk> <20041228110644.GB14010@ip.net.ua> <41D15650.7080504@DeepCore.dk> <20041228152641.GC14010@ip.net.ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 01:49:20PM +0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
>=20
>>Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>>
>>
>>>So I analyzed what was changed in this ata-chipset.c revision
>>>when it comes to my chip, and tried the following patch, and
>>>it brought me back my ad8 drive:
>>
>>Hmm, there are grimlins in there alright. Could you try the attached=20
>>patch as thats what I have in my WIP and it cleans up the code a bit as=
=20
>>well..
>>
>=20
> Tried that -- got the same identification failure followed by
> the double free panic.  But it cannot obviously help -- this
> patch is for ata_promise_chipinit(), and it by itself might be
> needed for something else, but my patch was for
> ata_promise_mio_reset() which doesn't seem to handle PRCMBO
> controllers at all in its current version.

Oh crap! I just got the first half of the patch in the diff, sorry 'bout =

that. I'll get the rest along when I get back to the lab tomorrow...

--=20

-S=F8ren




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?41D1BAD3.5020804>