From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 16 10:41:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E6D16A423 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F71243D62 for ; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:41:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anb (anb.matik.com.br [200.152.83.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k2GAfP9G017160; Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:41:25 -0300 (BRT) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 07:41:05 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <200603140740.38388.joao@matik.com.br> <200603151754.27250.joao@matik.com.br> <20060315144558.118c584b.kgunders@teamcool.net> In-Reply-To: <20060315144558.118c584b.kgunders@teamcool.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200603160741.05493.joao@matik.com.br> X-Filter-Version: 1.11a (msrv.matik.com.br) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: Re: amd64 slower than i386 on identical AMD 64 system? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:41:32 -0000 On Wednesday 15 March 2006 18:45, Ken Gunderson wrote: > > Also, you reported you were having memory related issues but I missed > any reply to my query regarding memory timings in BIOS. I've seen some > MB's ship w/1T and other aggressive timings enabled. I assume so > that they can get out of the box perf boost for those MS gaming > site reviews where stability takes a back seat to bleeding edge > performance. But these more aggressive timings can also cause stability > issues. I know and I remember that and did not answered because I wanted to check t= his=20 first than I forgot to answer, but the problem I have is certainly not memo= ry=20 related, it simply happened when having 4GB on the MB. Of course I do not use any kind of overclocking and the memory settings are= =20 default settings, On the MBs which support ECC I use it and otherwise I use= =20 correct dual-channel 1GB chips. The voltages detected seems to be correct = =20 and the powersuplies I used are good ones. Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br