From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 11 1:49:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (fw2.aub.dk [195.24.1.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A81D37B424; Fri, 11 May 2001 01:49:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f4B8i6p81922; Fri, 11 May 2001 10:44:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Bruce Evans Cc: mjacob@feral.com, Ruslan Ermilov , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DEVFS In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 11 May 2001 18:34:03 +1000." Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 10:44:06 +0200 Message-ID: <81920.989570646@critter> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message , Bruce Evan s writes: >> Blame the poor design of mount(2) (and ask Adrian when he fixes >> it :-) > >It must be the excellent design of mount(2) that makes it so easy to >do things with it where it can be used :-). Just too bad it wasn't designed so that it can be used from kernel processes as well :-( -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message