Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 6 Jun 2003 09:09:55 -0400
From:      "Michael W . Lucas" <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>
To:        freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Way forward with BIND 8
Message-ID:  <20030606090955.A85597@blackhelicopters.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030605235254.W5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg>; from DougB@freebsd.org on Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:09:04AM -0700
References:  <20030605235254.W5414@znfgre.qbhto.arg>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

As a sysadmin who rolls out many FreeBSD nameservers:

Please do as you suggest.

On Fri, Jun 06, 2003 at 12:09:04AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> [ Please respect followups to -arch, thanks. ]
> 
> As most of you are probably already aware, there have been two recent
> releases of BIND 8. Version 8.3.5 is the "bugfix, and new minor features"
> release on the 8.3.x branch that we've currently got in the tree already.
> 8.4.0 is (more or less) the "all the bug fixes from 8.3.5, plus support
> for IPv6 transport" version.
> 
> Because there are over 14k lines of diff between the source for 8.3.5 and
> 8.4.0, I'm hesitant to import the latter right away. Instead, as the
> nominal BIND maintainer, I'm proposing the following plan:
> 
> 1. Import 8.3.5 into HEAD, and upgrade the bind8 port. At the same time,
> create a bind84 port for the 8.4.x branch. The port will include the
> PORT_REPLACES_BASE functionality that we already have.
> 
> 2. At some suitable point in the near future (definitely before the next
> 4.x release), MFC 8.3.5.
> 
> 3. At some suitable point in the future, probably after the BIND 8.4.1
> release, import 8.4.x into HEAD.
> 
> I'm definitely in favor of improving support for IPv6, and BIND 8.4.x is
> going to be a big step in this direction. I'm just not sure that we should
> be adopting it in the base right away. My personal feeling is that having
> it in the ports for the convenience of early adopters is sufficient.
> However, my purpose in writing is to poll the community... I'm willing to
> be persuaded if folks have strong feelings about adopting 8.4.x in the
> base sooner rather than later, speak up now.
> 
> FYI, for those wondering why I'm not considering BIND 9 for import, please
> see http://people.freebsd.org/~dougb/whybind8.html
> 
> Doug
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-arch@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arch-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"

-- 
Michael Lucas		mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org
http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/

           Absolute OpenBSD:   http://www.AbsoluteOpenBSD.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030606090955.A85597>