From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 30 17:19:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F7D16A4CF; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:19:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif3-6-0-cust204.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.103.67.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEBB43D48; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:19:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from setantae@submonkey.net) Received: from setantae by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.43 (FreeBSD)) id 1CZBei-000OjH-46; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:19:12 +0000 Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:19:12 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Robert Watson Message-ID: <20041130171911.GR60679@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Robert Watson , Doug Barton , Ruslan Ermilov , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, phk@FreeBSD.org References: <41AC489E.7050108@DougBarton.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="LfQcPIWFRhGivmDw" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Sender: Ceri Davies cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: Doug Barton cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: phk@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sbin/mount mntopts.h mount.8 mount.c src/sbin/mount_std mount_std.8 X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 17:19:14 -0000 --LfQcPIWFRhGivmDw Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 30, 2004 at 02:39:52PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: >=20 > On Tue, 30 Nov 2004, Doug Barton wrote: >=20 > > >>FYI, this commit seems to have broken my line in fstab which has work= ed for > > >>a long time: > > >> > > >>md /tmp mfs rw,-s16m,noatime,nosuid,nodev= 2 0 > > >> > > >>Is it useful for the nodev option to cause a hard failure here? Note,= I'm > > >>not arguing against either change, just pointing out a side effect. > > >=20 > > > There's no longer a "nodev" option, please ask Poul-Henning for detai= ls. ;) > >=20 > > Yes, I understand the mechanics, I'm just curious if you think that this > > should result in a fatal error. It sounds like you think that the answer > > to that is yes, which if that is the correct answer I'm fine with that.= =20 >=20 > I think a reasonable alternative would be for use of the nodev option to > silently no-op in all cases but (perhaps) devfs, since the behavior > described for nodev is in fact now simply the way the system behaves. > Maybe the middle ground is to print a warning? If it's intended behaviour then it's probably ok as is for -HEAD. Ceri --=20 Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.) --LfQcPIWFRhGivmDw Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBrKuPocfcwTS3JF8RAopXAJ9Ar889lS4SbLW2atQX5SbfQYi2YQCgq8ch 1HGRw/XCXKbzgz3VbdTot+8= =3JEg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --LfQcPIWFRhGivmDw--