From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec  4 19:50:23 2010
Return-Path: <owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767)
	id A29C61065672; Sat,  4 Dec 2010 19:50:23 +0000 (UTC)
Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E37106564A
	for <perforce@freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 Dec 2010 19:50:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from trasz@freebsd.org)
Received: from skunkworks.freebsd.org (skunkworks.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::2d])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50E158FC15
	for <perforce@freebsd.org>; Sat,  4 Dec 2010 19:50:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from skunkworks.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by skunkworks.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB4JoNGH053315
	for <perforce@freebsd.org>; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:50:23 GMT
	(envelope-from trasz@freebsd.org)
Received: (from perforce@localhost)
	by skunkworks.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oB4JoNsd053310
	for perforce@freebsd.org; Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:50:23 GMT
	(envelope-from trasz@freebsd.org)
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2010 19:50:23 GMT
Message-Id: <201012041950.oB4JoNsd053310@skunkworks.freebsd.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: skunkworks.freebsd.org: perforce set sender to
	trasz@freebsd.org using -f
From: Edward Tomasz Napierala <trasz@FreeBSD.org>
To: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>
Precedence: bulk
Cc: 
Subject: PERFORCE change 186633 for review
X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
List-Id: p4 projects tree changes <p4-projects.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/p4-projects>
List-Post: <mailto:p4-projects@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/p4-projects>,
	<mailto:p4-projects-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Dec 2010 19:50:23 -0000

http://p4web.freebsd.org/@@186633?ac=10

Change 186633 by trasz@trasz_victim on 2010/12/04 19:49:49

	Update TODO.

Affected files ...

.. //depot/projects/soc2009/trasz_limits/TODO#32 edit

Differences ...

==== //depot/projects/soc2009/trasz_limits/TODO#32 (text+ko) ====

@@ -25,9 +25,15 @@
 
 Milestone 3:
 
- - inheritance: different resources need to sum things up differently
- - per-jail containers
- - per-jail resource limits
+ - Consider replacing proc pointer with thread pointer in rusage_add(9) et al.
+   In most cases caller uses 'td->td_proc' anyway, and passing thread would
+   allow the HRL code to send a signal to the offending thread instead of the
+   offending process.
+
+ - Do we need separate container hierarchy, or should we just drop it and use
+   ucred?
+
+ - Remove CONTAINERS #ifdefs.
 
 Issues:
 
@@ -73,8 +79,8 @@
    2. Replace single container_lock with individual per-container mutexes.
 
  - RUSAGE_NOFILE accounts for size of file descriptor table, rather than the number
-   of file descriptors.  This shouldn't be a problem, but might be worth remembering
-   about.
+   of file descriptors.  This shouldn't be a problem, but might be worth keeping
+   in mind.
 
  - We should have a limit for the number of files that were mmapped and then closed,
    and remain mapped in memory.
@@ -88,7 +94,7 @@
 
  - Bring back per-group limits.
 
- - Some things need to be accounted for per-euid, and some per-egid.  Geez.
+ - Some things need to be accounted for per-euid, and some per-ruid.  Geez.
 
  - In maxproc limit, make sure the 'p' argument is a child process.  Otherwise,
    if one adds rule with 'sig*' action, the signal will be sent to the parent