From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 10 17:58:11 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26D0D16A4CE for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:58:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.byd.ca (ns1.byd.ca [65.39.131.104]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8142443D4C for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:58:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@activeeffects.com) Received: (qmail 57913 invoked from network); 10 Feb 2005 17:57:39 -0000 Received: from cpe0000cd061f26-cm400026180624.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (HELO ?192.168.11.2?) (24.103.21.15) by 0 with SMTP; 10 Feb 2005 17:57:39 -0000 Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 12:54:49 -0500 (EST) From: Dave Wood X-X-Sender: dave@one.thequestion.net To: Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg In-Reply-To: <420B9FE8.1040308@401.cx> Message-ID: <20050210125103.D30735@one.thequestion.net> References: <200502091349.00708.algould@datawok.com> <420ACD5E.3030708@pacific.net.sg> <1709665858.20050210101217@wanadoo.fr> <420B8BFC.4070303@tbc.net> <20050210114338.B30327@one.thequestion.net> <420B9FE8.1040308@401.cx> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Logo Contest X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:58:11 -0000 On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg wrote: > As long as the resulting logo is not copyrighted in any way by them. > BSD has always been known for its liberal license, I would hate to end up > with a logo cluttered with a bunch of copyright junk. That (is/was) covered in the rules. It stated something to the effect that the copyright must be transferred to the FreeBSD Foundation. The Foundation would have to control/license users of it of course to maintain their rights to it. -- Dave Wood