From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 15 23:36:05 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F108137B401 for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:36:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net (stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.188]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C8AE43F3F for ; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:36:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tlambert2@mindspring.com) Received: from user-38lc1c9.dialup.mindspring.com ([209.86.5.137] helo=mindspring.com) by stork.mail.pas.earthlink.net with asmtp (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.33 #1) id 19cftL-0004WG-00; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:35:56 -0700 Message-ID: <3F14F20D.605BEBD5@mindspring.com> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 23:34:53 -0700 From: Terry Lambert X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Attila Nagy References: <20030715121429.A11267@hexapodia.org> <3F145157.4050009@fsn.hu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: b1a02af9316fbb217a47c185c03b154d40683398e744b8a47b9cbb4dea58817fefa48ab48c9021dda8438e0f32a48e08350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org cc: Patrik =?iso-8859-1?Q?Vesel=EDk?= Subject: Re: maximum of CPUs X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 06:36:05 -0000 Attila Nagy wrote: > Andy Isaacson wrote: > > I can't tell if you're talking about "supported by FreeBSD" or > > "supported running any OS". Several vendors sell boxes with 32 x86 > > processors, including IBM (the part that used to be Sequent), Unisys, > > and one of the Japanese vendors (NEC or Fujitsu or something like that). > > The easiest to find links to is > > http://www.unisys.com/products/es7000__servers/hardware/index.htm > > Even Linux needs a patch for these machines :) > http://lists.insecure.org/lists/linux-kernel/2003/Jun/2612.html > > AFAIK until this patch, only Windows 2000 was officially supported by > Unisys. The Sequent Symmetry (i386 based) was the same machine as the Unisys 5000/20, which was an OEM version of the box. I was pretty sure that the ES7000/40 was also an OEM Sequent box? If so, it may be that if they didn't put too much vendor BIOS voodoo in the things, this would also let them run on matching Sequent badged hardware... and that's some pretty cool iron, even these days. -- Terry