From owner-freebsd-multimedia  Mon Oct  7 10:31:24 1996
Return-Path: owner-multimedia
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id KAA12621
          for multimedia-outgoing; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 10:31:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from noc.msc.edu (noc.msc.edu [137.66.12.254])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id KAA12611
          for <multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 10:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uc.msc.edu by noc.msc.edu (5.65/MSC/v3.0.1(920324))
	id AA19542; Mon, 7 Oct 96 12:30:39 -0500
Received: from fergus-26.dialup.prtel.com by uc.msc.edu (5.65/MSC/v3.0z(901212))
	id AA07888; Mon, 7 Oct 96 12:30:34 -0500
Received: (from alk@localhost) by compound.Think.COM (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA05975; Mon, 7 Oct 1996 12:31:21 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 1996 12:31:21 -0500 (CDT)
From: Tony Kimball <alk@Think.COM>
Message-Id: <199610071731.MAA05975@compound.Think.COM>
To: james@miller.cs.uwm.edu
Cc: luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it, multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re:  x11 grabber in vic ?
References: <199610071329.IAA03084@miller.cs.uwm.edu>
Sender: owner-multimedia@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

: I beleive the author purposely left this out of vic.  It would sometimes
: get annoying to see people transmitting their screens over the mbone
: at 128kbps (or at a higher rate) and leave for the day :-(.

But... what good reason could there be for broadcast
of a static image to consume incremental dynamic bandwidth?