From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Mar 23 06:58:18 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D6B106566B;
	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:58:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9248B8FC22;
	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:58:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.61.3])
	by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3963F129;
	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:58:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n2N6wG5p042619;
	Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:58:16 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:03:25 +0100."
	<20090323060325.GN3102@garage.freebsd.pl> 
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:58:16 +0000
Message-ID: <42618.1237791496@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk
Cc: luigi@FreeBSD.org, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>,
	Ivan Voras <ivoras@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: RFC: adding 'proxy' nodes to provider ports (with patch) 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations
	<freebsd-geom.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-geom>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-geom@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-geom>,
	<mailto:freebsd-geom-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:58:19 -0000

In message <20090323060325.GN3102@garage.freebsd.pl>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek write
s:

>There is still a naming problem. pp and new_pp will end up with the same
>name. I'd suggest instructing GEOM to expose only parent in /dev/.

who said the new provider had to have same name ?

>The taste is still going to be send on new class arrival and on the last
>pp write close.

We decide that.

Since we are inserting in an already open path, I think it makes very
good sense to supress tasting, at least until close.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.