Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:21:11 -0700 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: David van Rensburg - PC Network <david@pcnetwork.co.za> Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw and nat problem Message-ID: <502A18D1-745D-48E9-B395-BDB5A24BD2FA@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <CA4A532F.F6E0%david@pcnetwork.co.za> References: <CA4A532F.F6E0%david@pcnetwork.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 18, 2011, at 12:17 PM, David van Rensburg - PC Network wrote: > In can mean traffic going from the lan to the internet AND from the > internet to the lan because either way it goes into the box as if flows > through the box correct? Yes, I think so. Most people seem to prefer to use "recv via _external_interface_" rather than "in" to identify traffic from the Internet at large incoming towards their machine or local subnet. Regards, -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?502A18D1-745D-48E9-B395-BDB5A24BD2FA>