From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 17 00:51:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A295106566B for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:51:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from falkman@gamozo.org) Received: from epicblunt.blendfresh.net (epicblunt.blendfresh.net [97.107.136.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 470E68FC17 for ; Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.146] (75-134-26-25.dhcp.mdsn.wi.charter.com [75.134.26.25]) (authenticated bits=0) by epicblunt.blendfresh.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o2H0boTG032430 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:37:58 -0500 Message-ID: <4BA02466.1070603@gamozo.org> Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:37:58 -0500 From: Brandon Falk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100310 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: kldload vs Statically compiled in kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 00:51:53 -0000 Hello fellow FreeBSD mates, I've always statically compiled in my modules into my kernel, rather then using kldload, or throwing them in /boot/loader.conf. I'm just wondering if there are actually any advantages to doing it this way. Thanks, Brandon Falk