From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 5 09:13:46 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433B1106567C for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 09:13:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: from mail5out.barnet.com.au (mail5.barnet.com.au [202.83.178.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE01C8FC23 for ; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 09:13:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@mavetju.org) Received: by mail5out.barnet.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CA8CA2218ACA; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:13:44 +1000 (EST) X-Viruscan-Id: <489819C80000E29F34E606@BarNet> Received: from mail5auth.barnet.com.au (mail5.barnet.com.au [202.83.178.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail5auth.barnet.com.au", Issuer "*.barnet.com.au" (verified OK)) by mail5.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C6421B49ED; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:13:44 +1000 (EST) Received: from k7.mavetju (ppp121-44-2-107.lns10.syd7.internode.on.net [121.44.2.107]) by mail5auth.barnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 294F52218A7C; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:13:44 +1000 (EST) Received: by k7.mavetju (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1F9F02EB; Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:12:51 +1000 (EST) Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 19:12:51 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20080805091251.GA26899@k7.mavetju> Mail-Followup-To: Edwin Groothuis , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, Michael Christie Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4898065A.5080008@powerzone.net.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Michael Christie Subject: Re: High Availability FreeBSD www cluster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 09:13:46 -0000 Personally I use DNS for failover between systems, but also have seen that net/haproxy is a good one to use if you want failover on network level. -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org edwin@mavetju.org | Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/