From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Mon Oct 8 00:26:07 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92C110AD281 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 00:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F21724E1 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 00:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2593A10AD280; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 00:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0327310AD27F for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 00:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8983C724E0 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 00:26:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D47AA1FB75 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 00:26:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w980Q4JE024672 for ; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 00:26:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w980Q4aC024671 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 8 Oct 2018 00:26:04 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 232058] mail/mutt-lite: restore this port Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:26:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: jdc@koitsu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2018 00:26:07 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D232058 Bug ID: 232058 Summary: mail/mutt-lite: restore this port Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Reporter: jdc@koitsu.org Today I found the following: mutt-lite-1.10.1 ? orphaned: mail/mutt-lite This correlates with r481126: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=3Drevision&revision=3D481126 2018-10-01 mail/mutt-lite: For a lite version of mutt build mail/mutt with = less (or zero) options Which makes no mention of the history or PR, which I had to dig up myself in r476197: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=3Drevision&revision=3D476197 Which claims "give users 2 months to move to mail/mutt". I saw absolutely = no message/warning about this deprecation, which indicates that the implementa= tion of said warning was done in such a way that **did not** take people using p= kg (binary packages) into mind. Proof is here, indicating that only people who built from ports (source) would see this warning: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/mail/mutt-lite/Makefile?r1=3D476197&r= 2=3D476196&pathrev=3D476197 Bug 229938 looks like the maintainer of the port decided to relinquish maintainership (which is 100% fine! It can go to ports@ in the meantime), = and instead opted... for its entire removal?! What was done here is not good practise ports-wise; not everyone installs ports, most people use binary packages, which means "build mail/mutt with l= ess or zero options" it not an option/choice available to them. It's scaring me how people don't seem to understand the relationship between ports and pkg.= I don't know how any of this was permitted by portmgr; it is not common pract= ise for port deprecation to work this way. Please either: a) Undo this change (probably not feasible given r476197), or, b) Create a stub port that includes fewer options as described. (This is exactly how tons of the *-lite, *-tiny, and *-nox11 ports work.) --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=