From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Aug 8 7: 9:38 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from epsilon.lucida.qc.ca (epsilon.lucida.qc.ca [216.95.146.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C032237B7E8 for ; Tue, 8 Aug 2000 07:09:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET) Received: (qmail 93400 invoked by uid 1000); 8 Aug 2000 14:09:17 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Aug 2000 14:09:17 -0000 Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2000 10:09:15 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Heckaman X-Sender: matt@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca To: Paul Herman Cc: FreeBSD-PORTS Subject: Re: pine 4.21 port issues? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 8 Aug 2000, Paul Herman wrote: ... : I'm not 100% sure, but it looks like patch-aw tries to address this. : : (I haven't tested it in 4.1-STABLE...) Yes, I saw that. From what I can see it just adds a condition whereby lock failure occurs. I have not looked at it in context yet but plan to do so today. From all the talks I've had with Rick lately though, I guess pine does do the right thing and I'm not realizing it. :) : -Paul. * Matt Heckaman - mailto:matt@lucida.qc.ca http://www.lucida.qc.ca/ * * GPG fingerprint - A9BC F3A8 278E 22F2 9BDA BFCF 74C3 2D31 C035 5390 * -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp iD8DBQE5kBSMdMMtMcA1U5ARAtJCAJ47OZ/CRan343k7ZvMZ2eBkf9qTEwCfTox8 luFtbLUiwQhVc1opzsAB5Ik= =WIqg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message