From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Fri Apr 21 11:58:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A6CD47191; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:58:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from mail109.syd.optusnet.com.au (mail109.syd.optusnet.com.au [211.29.132.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AC0F99C; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:58:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brde@optusnet.com.au) Received: from besplex.bde.org (c122-106-153-191.carlnfd1.nsw.optusnet.com.au [122.106.153.191]) by mail109.syd.optusnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E2ED66337; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 21:58:32 +1000 (AEST) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 21:58:30 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Rick Macklem cc: Bruce Evans , Rick Macklem , "src-committers@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: svn commit: r317240 - head/sys/fs/nfs In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20170421215452.R2416@besplex.bde.org> References: <201704210150.v3L1ofgl014509@repo.freebsd.org>, <20170421141623.A1141@besplex.bde.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Optus-CM-Score: 0 X-Optus-CM-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=AYLBJzfG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=Tj3pCpwHnMupdyZSltBt7Q==:117 a=Tj3pCpwHnMupdyZSltBt7Q==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=p2sOvODb33Ro217gv_8A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:58:39 -0000 On Fri, 21 Apr 2017, Rick Macklem wrote: > Yes, I agree that hardcoded values are bad. > Thanks for pointing out the constants in sys/conf.h, I can use those instead. > sys/conf.h does not have an entry for "nogroup", which is what has been used > by nfsuserd since it was written. > > Is adding an entry to sys/conf.h for GID_NOGROUP ok to do? It is currently mostly for device configuration, but the user/group defines in it are already misplaced (for convenience) so a couple more wouldn't hurt. > rick > ps: I hope you don't mind the top post... I prefer not. Bruce