From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Mar 10 15:36:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from trinity.skynet.be (trinity.skynet.be [195.238.2.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A00937B954 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 15:36:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from blk@skynet.be) Received: from [195.238.22.79] (dialup847.brussels.skynet.be [195.238.22.79]) by trinity.skynet.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC63122C3; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 00:36:38 +0100 (MET) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: blk@pop.skynet.be Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <38C95C45.944DE382@detar.org> References: <38C95C45.944DE382@detar.org> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2000 00:23:46 +0100 To: Jason Detar , Matt Heckaman From: Brad Knowles Subject: Re: FreeBSD SMP in 3.4-stable Cc: FreeBSD-STABLE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 3:34 PM -0500 2000/3/10, Jason Detar wrote: > Matt, I have quite a few machines with SMP under the stable branch. I'm not > real sure how "tested" it is but I have no problems whatsoever. I'm running 3.2-RELEASE on a dual-CPU Pentium III/450Mhz machine that is used as our primary news peering server, with 95 peers, and currently in the Freenix Top 50. 3.2-RELEASE has proven pretty stable for us, and I believe that 3.4-STABLE is even more robust. -- These are my opinions and should not be taken as official Skynet policy ========================================================================= Brad Knowles, Sys. Arch., Mail/News/FTP/Proxy Admin Note: No Microsoft programs were used in the creation or distribution of this message. If you are using a Microsoft program to view this message, be forewarned that I am not responsible for any harm you may encounter as a result. See for details. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message