From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 20 20:18:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA05CB99; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 20:18:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lausts@laus.org) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977232F11; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 20:18:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=LYm+G0ji c=1 sm=0 a=DktfseARn6RskVgg/AMIPQ==:17 a=I9A6gpd8bSkA:10 a=wom5GMh1gUkA:10 a=Bfvz-oXPwwwA:10 a=kWQ6D_09QQAA:10 a=kHc8Q_KJ-KsA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=N54-gffFAAAA:8 a=4lH5e3ujAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=U3ULefgJXXAA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=dI5WILix2ns95CKkAOIA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=DktfseARn6RskVgg/AMIPQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 98.31.3.233 Received: from [98.31.3.233] ([98.31.3.233:51021] helo=mail.laus.org) by hrndva-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 8C/74-08330-3ADAC325; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 20:18:43 +0000 Received: from mail.laus.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.laus.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r8KKIhEQ034407 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:18:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lausts@laus.org) Received: (from lausts@localhost) by mail.laus.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id r8KKIhr7034406; Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:18:43 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lausts) Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 16:18:42 -0400 From: Thomas Laus To: Gary Palmer , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9-Stable + Atom D510 Freeze Message-ID: <20130920201842.GA34392@mail.laus.org> References: <523AFF46.29244.4657A1@lausts.acm.org> <523B91F2.8070004@heuristicsystems.com.au> <523C49A9.5719.289C1E@lausts.acm.org> <20130920143615.GA40029@in-addr.com> <20130920144928.GA50355@mail.laus.org> <20130920155208.GA55143@in-addr.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130920155208.GA55143@in-addr.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE on an amd64 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: lausts@acm.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2013 20:18:45 -0000 Gary Palmer [gpalmer@freebsd.org] wrote: > It used to be that ports had MAKE_JOBS_SAFE in the Makefile to mark that > the port could be built using parallel compiles with the '-j' argument > to make. It appears that the logic has been switched and now you have > to mark them as MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE to say that parallel builds shouldn't be > done, indicating that parallel builds are the default now (unless I'm > misreading the code) > > You can try putting > > DISABLE_MAKE_JOBS=yes > > into /etc/make.conf to see if that stops the problem on port builds. > Gary: Making that change worked for me. I built both Subversion and Tshark, my two problem children. The build time was not too much different than without the flag. Only 1 CPU was active with cc1 at a time. I had no 'pfault' states on any entries in top for both builds. I guess that we can close out this issue. Thank you and the list for the suggestion. Tom -- Public Keys: PGP KeyID = 0x5F22FDC1 GnuPG KeyID = 0x620836CF