From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 07:47:51 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA1CF106566C; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:47:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cvs-src@yandex.ru) Received: from forward12.mail.yandex.net (forward12.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 557AC8FC1A; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:47:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp14.mail.yandex.net (smtp14.mail.yandex.net [95.108.131.192]) by forward12.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9AAC9C220AC; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:47:49 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1315295269; bh=yzc4MC/dxPmFfahtqd43ThpHXwX0sRVy5JJwbsEk3zY=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HRqEQGv0sK0PK++hPsvGaB9wynBMSTpM1x8y3O6GtsCR7SqbjhPxbG3Cg5F9NiVpj FASG0liIEzkypvit9f538OoUXEYzDWdN8uT7lA+Dq9JlsV0V8J/MBeyswkRIFZoW1t Ielm+lqMrYaX9MHIlzzd9CuhsPsNrCDsa2Jzn8GU= Received: from smtp14.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp14.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 735C41B60214; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:47:49 +0400 (MSD) Received: from unknown (unknown [213.27.65.65]) by smtp14.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTP id llUajPKd; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:47:49 +0400 X-Yandex-Spam: 1 Message-ID: <4E65D01B.6020407@yandex.ru> Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 11:47:39 +0400 From: Ruslan Mahmatkhanov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:6.0) Gecko/20110828 Thunderbird/6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4E64C077.8050403@yandex.ru> <4E656B6E.5080105@FreeBSD.org> <4E65C964.7070503@yandex.ru> <4E65CAC3.2040705@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4E65CAC3.2040705@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Ports Mailing List , Mark Linimon , wen heping Subject: Re: Maintainership of py-zopetesting and py-zopeevent X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:47:51 -0000 Doug Barton wrote on 06.09.2011 11:24: > On 09/06/2011 00:19, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: >> we already have plenty of portnames with dot in them > > That's not a good reason to add more. > > I did read the rest of your post, and while I sympathize with your > arguments, I'm not convinced by them. The good news for you however is > that I'm not in charge of anything. :) > > > Doug Ok, assume, you are developer :). And you ship some app on your website (we name it "portmaster"). And you implement plugin framework for it, and release the first plugin that you name "portmaster-plugin.do-the-best" (i know it's rather stupid name, but it's an example), that will allow to user successfully build any port (even if it broken on that user's arch, and even if it not exists yet) without any problems. And you just announce it on the offsite: "Please install that portmaster-plugin.do-the-best and you will forget about all the problems you expected earlier days". And there is some kind soul that added it to ports tree with name "portmaster-plug-in_dothebest", since he decide that it's better than original name and some unnecessary dots and spaces is avoided too. User just can't find it in the tree and will continue crying on the ports@ that FreeBSD ports is such unprofessional and unconvinient :) -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.