From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Apr 19 22:33:28 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E8937BDC9
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 22:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@billy-club.village.org)
Received: from billy-club.village.org (billy-club.village.org [10.0.0.3])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA64068;
	Wed, 19 Apr 2000 23:33:21 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@billy-club.village.org)
Received: from billy-club.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by billy-club.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id XAA11062; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 23:32:25 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200004200532.XAA11062@billy-club.village.org>
To: Iain Templeton <iain@research.canon.com.au>
Subject: Re: 4.0/stable and Cyrix 
Cc: Bob K <melange@yip.org>, spork <spork@super-g.com>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 20 Apr 2000 14:44:23 +1000."
		<Pine.SOL.4.10.10004201440560.10344-100000@elph.research.canon.com.au> 
References: <Pine.SOL.4.10.10004201440560.10344-100000@elph.research.canon.com.au>  
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 23:32:25 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <Pine.SOL.4.10.10004201440560.10344-100000@elph.research.canon.com.au> Iain Templeton writes:
: It does seem to perform fast enough to be a 333MHz chip rather than a
: 250MHz chip (at least compared to my PII-233 it took <3hrs compared to
: more than 4hrs for a buildworld, but that might be something else as
: well).

Maybe it is just a bug in FreeBSD's MHz calc routines for this chip.
FreeBSD measures this value by counting the number of iterations
through a loop.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message