From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 8 15:24:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8ED10656A9 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:24:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from usleepless@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f213.google.com (mail-bw0-f213.google.com [209.85.218.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79028FC34 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 15:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so4472102bwz.3 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:24:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OoU6iiX1M5OyGbr6X903szlAb8EHDYBv5X3Wp2Bgu1Q=; b=O2/dfZ25gHEvYD3TUU8A8nZNy32cSjaUt2nsyOSzDbVRqJGUSv8hrTYvH7Z8kI/cvl MzcJIv/DhPQBQMvutyXdx3FlLQqDE1DFwWrbaADUafC5JPLIrAa7342Vz0SVvASC8I38 M4VZ1pmRIcXRDyoqtrveYlVmtyDe+HXg1pOp0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=GjD5g9JsiHXK3fw7wY8qRsSBtIFHhiy2R644k2IqX5Xnc3MGdx2a9G6D5PAFnbyYId 6E0QdpVqYQjDWyRbXt98BeVyqK5BsQrljSoA++WdFi1GapkGTrl07tLLn0iLODrlDTp6 AmtA54bCFXM1vReJHPek4sWMVZHXxblgOXUko= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.10.2 with SMTP id n2mr8870660bkn.91.1260285881192; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 07:24:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4B1E6CD9.30402@videotron.ca> References: <4B1E69F1.6040107@videotron.ca> <4B1E6CD9.30402@videotron.ca> Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2009 16:24:41 +0100 Message-ID: From: usleepless@gmail.com To: PJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: flash alternative X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 15:24:47 -0000 On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 4:12 PM, PJ wrote: > PJ wrote: > > I have heard that there is an alternative to flash that is apparently > > more efficient and less cumbersome in terms of data transfers; and that > > it is "lighter" whatever that may mean. > > Anyone know anything about this? > I think you are referring to Silverlight, right? Silverlight on FreeBSD is extremely lightweight. regards, usleep > > TIA > > PJ > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > > > Could F3 be the alternative/replacement? > http://blogs.sun.com/bblfish/entry/f3:_a_replacement_for_flash%3F > http://blogs.sun.com/chrisoliver/ > > I'd like to hear some opinions on this. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >