From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 15 22:41:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82247DDC for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59978CA7 for ; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:41:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 491CF33C46; Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:41:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Warren Block Subject: Re: exiting Xorg locks up 9.2-STABLE system References: <20141015144925.GC3963@itcom245.staff.itd.umich.edu> Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:41:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Warren Block's message of "Wed, 15 Oct 2014 09:08:47 -0600 (MDT)") Message-ID: <4438apvtu2.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: William Bulley , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2014 22:41:59 -0000 Warren Block writes: > On Wed, 15 Oct 2014, William Bulley wrote: > >> According to Warren Block on Wed, 10/15/14 at 10:34: >>> >>> Does it really lock up, or is it just that text console does not display >>> anything? Test by typing startx again. If that works, use vt(4): >>> https://wiki.freebsd.org/Newcons >>> That might require updating to 9.3 and the newer version of xorg. >> >> D'oh! Stupid typo. I recently upgraded to 9.3-STABLE and rebuilt >> all my ports from source. >> >> And, yes, I had WITH_NEW_XORG=true in my /etc/make.conf file before >> starting the rebuild of all my ports. >> >> Are you saying that (given all the above that I have done), this new >> problem that I have encountered can be eliminated by putting vt(4) in >> my kernel config file, rebuilding my kernel and then rebooting? > > If you are using a custom kernel, yes. GENERIC now contains both sc > and vt, so vt must be selected by adding kern.vty=vt to > /boot/loader.conf. Not on 9.3, as far as I can see. Have I missed something?