Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 18:04:38 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 255264] Unable to add default route for fib Message-ID: <bug-255264-7501-VACtoc0zsZ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-255264-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-255264-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D255264 --- Comment #8 from Mitja Horvat <pinkfluid@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Marek Zarychta from comment #7) Thank you very much for the prompt response. Indeed, setting the fib of the= re0 interface 1 makes the route work. However this causes all the traffic routed through re0 to use fib 1 as default, which is not really what I want. The use case I'm trying to solve is to have a mix of processes/jail running= on fib 1 using setfib, everything else should go through the interface normally using fib 0. Even if it's a feature, I find it very strange that a valid static route wo= uld fail if there's no carrier. I even tried unplugging the ethernet cable and = the script above basically loops until I connect the cable and carrier is detec= ted. I think I'll play with pf to get what I need (or just reset re0's fib to 0 = in rc.local), but I still find this to be a very peculiar behavior. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-255264-7501-VACtoc0zsZ>