From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb  8 13:22:29 2005
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA5716A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Feb 2005 13:22:29 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from relay.rdsnet.ro (gimli.rdsnet.ro [193.231.236.70])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BD6EF43D4C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Tue,  8 Feb 2005 13:22:28 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com)
Received: (qmail 745 invoked from network); 8 Feb 2005 13:17:55 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO smtp.rdsnet.ro) (62.231.74.130)
  by smtp1-133.rdsnet.ro with SMTP; 8 Feb 2005 13:17:55 -0000
Received: (qmail 30510 invoked by uid 89); 8 Feb 2005 13:25:35 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO it.buh.tecnik93.com) (81.196.204.98)
  by 0 with SMTP; 8 Feb 2005 13:25:35 -0000
Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost.buh.tecnik93.com [127.0.0.1])
	by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2DA114D2;
	Tue,  8 Feb 2005 15:22:25 +0200 (EET)
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:22:24 +0200
From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu <itetcu@people.tecnik93.com>
To: v0rbiz@icon.bg
Message-ID: <20050208152224.65536bad@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
In-Reply-To: <4293.213.222.48.10.1107867077.squirrel@mailgw.icon.bg>
References: <Pine.BSO.4.56.0502081306440.28295@ux11.ltcm.net>
	<200502081333.08964.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
	<20050208144343.5bd6dd76@it.buh.tecnik93.com>
	<4293.213.222.48.10.1107867077.squirrel@mailgw.icon.bg>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ULE status
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2005 13:22:30 -0000

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:51:17 +0200 (EET)
"Viktor Ivanov" <v0rbiz@icon.bg> wrote:

> On Tue, =D4=E5=E2=F0=F3=E0=F0=E8 8, 2005 14:43, Ion-Mihai Tetcu =EA=E0=E7=
=E0:
> > Could you tell us again after a week ? There used to be a panic when
> > using rtprio to raise the priority of a running process, do you know if
> > it's fix ?
> >
>=20
> I never had those, and I usually run mplayer with rtprio 30... Though
> mplayer never uses much CPU, only when playing WMV9. Sorry I can't
> test the new patches too 'cause the WS is not available now.

On changing, not running from the beginning
rtprio 31 -mpayer_pid

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D71310
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040303131655.24317.qmail


--=20
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"