From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Nov 14 04:38:14 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38D891108FE7 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f52.google.com (mail-io1-f52.google.com [209.85.166.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D48B8CA00 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:38:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cse.cem@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io1-f52.google.com with SMTP id h19-v6so10728018iog.9 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:38:13 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=mlpIPwrTI31RJtPeyHGNJjMHtnH1njjXC3M1UKdpurg=; b=AQgSvaGspdznekHJu3UVLOkMu0hi/trhnXYvjuem90+GCIYxT+P2A0h7o2lvJmvr4U bRfbzzJkBoCGW0aVHzr7DxGBncIEx9oc5L9urQZkw5YYaA8PnvqvcaeXmOqmP2Yh8hOh GmC+6Lp7TIa28IA3/6KSxxlAGu8i2ksuMOdJNsxjS5Qq2VTsasK6lRd5QXkvEu5jGwRd HOf8G/noODNF9lTf4ier649kHPfO/XtSd6UzgI/LKSmO20kSVLX89qX4WUtuVvw07UKY WVMeK1BJtjL7+TNFAhppiFaH1448LL8cRc08A9X2361m09G5dgZYzIqCm7MvHovVGOwe 4TUw== X-Gm-Message-State: AGRZ1gJc98HnD0n7h6FQ/kSLf+e9gDrlA31Xks6TX2GZCmuF0XVObcPW Kiy1fyqZGTW9/eJMmhRmPAo9yHJS X-Google-Smtp-Source: AJdET5drZZjUBFQa0B/jYZDjSQMA4xteo/T3klqAD/ercCzqhWrGB754Uq7zlXf+GxpsBCZvJplJfg== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:b3c2:: with SMTP id c185-v6mr270260iof.169.1542170292287; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:38:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-io1-f41.google.com (mail-io1-f41.google.com. [209.85.166.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g18-v6sm7117138itg.7.2018.11.13.20.38.12 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:38:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-io1-f41.google.com with SMTP id m19so5084143ioh.3 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:38:12 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a6b:3ad5:: with SMTP id h204-v6mr288741ioa.124.1542170291506; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:38:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <2898686.bT80LyP3VS@photon.int.bluestop.org> <2418724.ffieBuXMo3@photon.int.bluestop.org> In-Reply-To: <2418724.ffieBuXMo3@photon.int.bluestop.org> Reply-To: cem@freebsd.org From: Conrad Meyer Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 20:38:00 -0800 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: No amdtemp sysctls, acpi errors, AMD Ryzen 5 2400G To: Rebecca Cran Cc: freebsd-current Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 6D48B8CA00 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.99 / 200.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; REPLYTO_ADDR_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: alt3.gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.89)[-0.892,0]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; IP_SCORE(-1.09)[ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.50), asn: 15169(-1.84), country: US(-0.10)]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[cem@freebsd.org,csecem@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[52.166.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:38:14 -0000 On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 8:29 PM Rebecca Cran wrote: > > On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 21:17:59 MST Conrad Meyer wrote: > > > Maybe it should be -54 instead of +54? 183-(54*2) is the somewhat > > plausible 75?C (still pretty warm even for load). How good is your > > cooling solution? > > D'oh, of course it's -54 instead of +54 (For some reason I presumed a positive > offset would be *subtracted*)! I have an all-in-one liquid thermaltake > cooler installed, and under Windows it reports reaching 67C when running flat > out, which doesn't seem bad. Yeah, 67C seems totally great at load. > > (The references I can find with a quick search suggest TR 29xx should > > also be -27? rather than -54?C, but they may be mistaken. 183-54-27 > > is still 102?C ? extremely hot!) > > That's why I thought 54 was more likely! My 2990WX has 4 units for 32 cores > instead of 2 units and 16 cores for other models, so I guessed that perhaps I > should double the 27 value other people had said should be used. Hm, the Linux folks still use -27 for the 2990WX as well as all of the other threadripper models. I'm not sure what's right. I wish I had access to the Ryzen 2 register docs, but I don't. Best, Conrad