From owner-freebsd-current Fri Mar 1 02:11:36 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id CAA01754 for current-outgoing; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 02:11:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from tfs.com (tfs.com [140.145.250.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA01749 for ; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 02:11:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.tfs.com by tfs.com (smail3.1.28.1) with SMTP id m0tsRoB-0003vrC; Fri, 1 Mar 96 02:11 PST Received: from localhost.tfs.com (localhost.tfs.com [127.0.0.1]) by critter.tfs.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with SMTP id LAA02197; Fri, 1 Mar 1996 11:11:17 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: critter.tfs.com: Host localhost.tfs.com didn't use HELO protocol To: Adam David cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /etc/netstart and NFS /usr In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 01 Mar 1996 01:59:28 GMT." <199603010159.BAA08622@veda.is> Date: Fri, 01 Mar 1996 11:11:16 +0100 Message-ID: <2195.825675076@critter.tfs.com> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Quoting from /etc/netstart: > > # XXX This is known to cause an error if /usr is nfs mounted since it > # will not be available until after the network is up :-(. Once the > # relocation of sysctl to /sbin is done that problem will go away. > > This comment has been there for a long time. Does it mean that sysctl is > destined for /sbin (and overdue for the move), or should it be independently > copied there on hosts which have /usr mounted by NFS? > > There is a similar problem with routed(8) if it is used. at least sysctl should probably be moved yes. Herr CVS-meister ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.