From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 16:39:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40AEE8AD; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tethys.ringofsaturn.com (tethys.ringofsaturn.com [71.252.219.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC3BA5E2; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ASSP.nospam (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by tethys.ringofsaturn.com (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBFGdMAF007532; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:39:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com) Received: from mail.ringofsaturn.com ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.ringofsaturn.com) by ASSP.nospam with ESMTP (ASSP 1.9.9); 15 Dec 2014 10:39:21 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 10:39:21 -0600 From: Rusty Nejdl To: Guido Falsi Subject: Re: Giving Up Maintainership Reply-To: rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com Mail-Reply-To: rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com In-Reply-To: <548EF8D5.8090005@FreeBSD.org> References: <548EF8D5.8090005@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: rnejdl@ringofsaturn.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.2 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1 Cc: ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:39:24 -0000 On 2014-12-15 09:05, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 12/15/14 15:09, Rusty Nejdl wrote: > >> Sorry guys, but I will have to give up maintainership on my 10 ports as I have completely run out of time and am not keeping up with my ports and keeping them to standards. I'll jump back in when I can and thank you all in advance. > >> CALIBRE [2] Ebook management application > > I'll take this one since I use it. I'll commit the maintainer change > later today. > > Unluckily upgrading it will be a problem since new version depends on > Python QT5 libraries. > > So I take a chance to ask: > > Is there any active work on creating ports for these? > > Who should I talk about this to? I had to completely stop on Calibre because of the dependency on QT5. I did start on 2.1.0 and can send you the pieces if that will help. Rusty From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 17:12:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E81FD142 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com (mail-wi0-f170.google.com [209.85.212.170]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78CC6AC3 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:12:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f170.google.com with SMTP id bs8so11177884wib.5 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:12:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=bgBam6sIFJx2OJIopUxthfhlOK1ChumyTL3yZktzFXg=; b=AP1f754L1pwZ6qs/fZs42yrpAIElrVkyF162WHT0uSsqUgL/CB/nLvavJdoH1HZe+L AmiQ0BvYGA5LO6k4/1hYQ0BsbyqpCblzHBMwKz0rGzRfeTr90BksTL6aBsPrg5iSaVUs YLBNfGcI5doQoL2gfVtoa8kHZPpBFU4tqVxyKuBsVECj6iSM3SmmLCMThVdKczq/4Lrj /CWmJfgW5D0R+yyzL/3upqfX0rI6SSTv01c4xavhRp7IuEoGTeItQNsP7SX+Q0BiiDvQ jKtCZZRUevIVxW5OvWQtPZw7B3tr9w7EmaX5MITTDxqeVTFwIuVdqTA2whRz5nLf73n1 ElGA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkCELdfHFQc5WPI9LilxtZN2T2FYo/BCAfECzUMZnMRrSQuOa1ogk4+QAfl4jYuk4J/OcFk X-Received: by 10.194.5.227 with SMTP id v3mr54666834wjv.63.1418660037021; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:13:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.10.1.68] (82-69-141-170.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.141.170]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm13776858wiy.17.2014.12.15.08.13.56 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 15 Dec 2014 08:13:56 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <548F0852.2050605@multiplay.co.uk> Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 16:12:02 +0000 From: Steven Hartland User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeffrey Bouquet , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Another pkg showstopper-- more information References: <1418408422.13975.YahooMailBasic@web140904.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <548B332F.3000502@multiplay.co.uk> <548B4092.9000605@yahoo.com> <548EF83C.2060909@multiplay.co.uk> <548EFBF2.4040003@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <548EFBF2.4040003@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 17:12:45 -0000 On 15/12/2014 15:19, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: > On 12/15/14 07:03, Steven Hartland wrote: >> On 12/12/2014 19:22, Jeffrey Bouquet wrote: >>> On 12/12/14 10:25, Steven Hartland wrote: >>>> Unless I'm missing something you don't actually provide any >>>> information about the issue your actually seeing? >>>> >>>> I personally have already updated 10 or so boxes with a wide range of >>>> packages to pkg 1.4 and apart from a change with the handling of pkg >>>> upgrade -f , which was an intended fix, I didn't have any >>>> problems. >>>> >>>> So not sure what your "show stopper" is or what you think could be >>>> tested more thoroughly (don't forget the call for testing did go out >>>> the other week, so looks like there was quite a bit of opportunity to >>>> get involved. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> On 12/12/2014 18:20, Jeffrey Bouquet via freebsd-ports wrote: >>>>> Reverted to pkg, by build, and FORCE PKG REGISTER. >>>>> >>>>> pkgs still cannot be installed. >>>>> >>>>> Still stuck with ports ( however portupgrade -- non-packages -- seems >>>>> to be >>>>> working with this pkg << pkg-devel downgrade ) >>>>> >>>>> (/ portmaster? == no, cannot get >>>>> handle, lock on database) only. >>>>> >>>>> ..............###########...............##################........... >>>>> >>>>> Should pkg and/or pkg-devel be more thoroughly tested before >>>>> release into the tree? No other pkg usually hints at similar pkg >>>>> system(s) breakage without a proven recovery/rollback procedure >>>>> already documented... similar to what portupgrade does with its >>>>> saving of shared libraries prior to upgrade of a port. >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>> "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> Bringing the list back into this, as its not my area: >> >>> pkg install wants to install extra ports and abort traps >> You'll want to post details about, OS version, pkg version, and the >> exact error with any stack trace >>> pkg add a "pkg fetched" file, cannot install it by package, wrong >>> architecture >>> (freebsd >> FreeBSD or vice versa, setting somewhere, etc) >> This doesn't make any sense to me, to others it may do but, always >> best to include proper steps and the output of the commands so people >> know exactly what your doing and the issue your seeing. >>> portupgrade works on some ports still, but machine > machine broken >>> because of pkg issues >>> and portupgrade -P broken similarly >>> >>> portmaster cannot install, convoluted error (lock on database and/or >>> already installed error(s)) >>> >>> So the /var/db/pkg build machine functionality also the portmaster -P >>> portupgrade -P >>> are broken. Here. Maybe these could be tested on all architectures >>> before each new package >>> upgrade? Another layer of machines, so to speak, "just because NOT " >> Again you don't provide any real details of the issues, you might of >> well have said "its broken" >>>>> of SQlite.. ... one >>> used to not have to post to the list or even subscribe to have reliable >>> LAN build set. >>> > I just updated 195471 bugzilla with a two week update. Fixed > (temporarily?) the wrong > architecture error with a missing pkg.conf file or reversion of one of > them which was not > missing, and have a workaround for the errors that remain, but it is > tedious and > worrisome, to say the least. Compared to how it could be with more SQL > coders on > board... maybe. Cant say I've ever had any issues, its always just worked, so worth posting your customizations. > > Made a post in a thread on the forums with the same information as the > update in > the PR above. > > For what it is worth... > Just read the digest of Freebsd-STABLE that arrived today, others are also > disillusioned with the priority given to pkg(ng) fixes for what was > once a not-exact but > very reliable packaging system across releases. > > > > Thanks for forwarding to the list. Unsure with each email sent > precisely the number of > recipients, but the fewer, the more likelihood the sometimes "could not > be sent" appears... > > Mostly wishing for a procedure to fix it before needing to upgrade to > v10 !! Never had to > reinstall since v5.0x AFAIK... Copying to the list again. You might want to see if you have a reply to list or reply to all option in your mail client there Jeffrey, as I said this not my area but the pkgng are very good, so given the right information I'm sure someone will be able to help. Regards Steve