Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:02:12 -0600
From:      Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com>
To:        mexas@bristol.ac.uk
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: r244114 ia64: make check-old-libs says /lib/libz.so.5 can be removed, but it is still needed by /usr/sbin/dtrace and /usr/sbin/lockstat
Message-ID:  <CACdU%2Bf-3W3LJy-607VN5oo66jmd-jPFpQBaqdqy0NWApFeBKCg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACdU%2Bf_XthNDpdz2D8p685_1XiymrfpEpbiATcn==-Uia4y0xw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <201212121007.qBCA7Hu9028406@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <CACdU%2Bf_XthNDpdz2D8p685_1XiymrfpEpbiATcn==-Uia4y0xw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Scot Hetzel <swhetzel@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
>> I updated to r244114 on ia64 following the
>> standard procedure. I then get:
>>
>> # make check-old-libs
>>>>> Checking for old libraries
>> /lib/libz.so.5
>> #
>>
>> while sysutils/libchk shows:
>>
>> Binaries that are linked with: /lib/libz.so.5
>>         /usr/sbin/dtrace
>>         /usr/sbin/lockstat
>>
>> and indeed these two executables depend
>> on this library:
>>
>> # ldd /usr/sbin/dtrace
>> /usr/sbin/dtrace:
>>         libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000)
>>         libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000)
>>         libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000)
>>         libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000)
>>         libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000)
>>         libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x2000000020246000)
>>         libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x2000000020294000)
>> # ldd /usr/sbin/lockstat
>> /usr/sbin/lockstat:
>>         libdtrace.so.2 => /lib/libdtrace.so.2 (0x2000000020094000)
>>         libproc.so.2 => /usr/lib/libproc.so.2 (0x2000000020194000)
>>         libctf.so.2 => /lib/libctf.so.2 (0x20000000201a8000)
>>         libelf.so.1 => /usr/lib/libelf.so.1 (0x20000000201d0000)
>>         libz.so.5 => /lib/libz.so.5 (0x2000000020210000)
>>         librt.so.1 => /usr/lib/librt.so.1 (0x2000000020246000)
>>         libthr.so.3 => /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x200000002025e000)
>>         libc.so.7 => /lib/libc.so.7 (0x20000000202ac000)
>> #
>>
>> I see that these two executables are old:
>>
>> # ls -al /usr/sbin/dtrace /usr/sbin/lockstat
>> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  58976 Jul 18  2010 /usr/sbin/dtrace
>> -r-xr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  72832 Jul 18  2010 /usr/sbin/lockstat
>> #
>>
>> Does this mean that both dtrace and lockstat
>> are obsolete and can be removed?
>>
> These 2 programs are part of the CDDL liscensed code.
>
> Do you have WITHOUT_CDDL defined in your src.conf or make.conf? If it
> is defined, then you can remove them.  Otherwise you'll need to
> determine why they are not being built/installed.
>
I had another look at cddl/usr.sbin/Makefile, and it only builds
lockstat and dtrace for i386, amd64, and powerpc.  It doesn't build
them for ia64.  So it is safe to remove them.

-- 
DISCLAIMER:

No electrons were mamedi while sending this message. Only slightly bruised.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACdU%2Bf-3W3LJy-607VN5oo66jmd-jPFpQBaqdqy0NWApFeBKCg>