Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:58:44 -0800 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What about inode file system? (Re: the current status of nullfs, unionfs) Message-ID: <20050310175844.GA697@odin.ac.hmc.edu> In-Reply-To: <200503101253.20876.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> References: <200503100128.j2A1SP4h014420@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> <200503101253.20876.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 12:53:20PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > A few years ago, there was a project making a filesystem, where a file's = name=20 > will simply be its inode number. It was intended to save on the name-to-i= node=20 > lookups of a regular filesystem, for applications like Squid, which keep = file=20 > names in some sort of a database already. >=20 > Does anyone know, what became of that? To the naive me it seems like this= can=20 > just be a mount option for ufs. Thanks! The inode file system was removed to ease UFS2 development. It's in the Attic under sys/ufs/ifs. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCMIrTXY6L6fI4GtQRAmUFAKDZTgY8b92cdRxo57quKET/hNyzZgCfdDgC v38NNl406BDXuI4Bg3w3ZH4= =TpEj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IJpNTDwzlM2Ie8A6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050310175844.GA697>